
How to Avoid Overbuilding or Underbuilding
By Sam Burnette, AIA
When James Kildare, the CEO of
Multispecialty Surgery Associates, proposes that the surgeons in his 15-member
practice construct an ambulatory surgery center (ASC), every partner reacts with
enthusiasm. Unfortunately, their enthusiasm is based on 15 different visions of
the ideal surgery center. But Dr. Kildare quickly discovers that his partners
are unanimous on one point: Each wants a surgical suite reserved for his or her
exclusive use. Now, he faces the daunting task of developing a plan for the
center that satisfies all of his partners and still meets the group’s
requirements for sound financial performance.
The problem Dr. Kildare faces is all too common. He and his
partners want to build an ASC that offers state-of-the-art suites and equipment,
ease of scheduling for them, and ease of access for their patients. Oh, and one
more thing; it needs to be a profitable investment for their practice. How do
they reconcile all of their goals?
The key is to build a center that’s exactly the right size. Overbuilding creates high up-front costs that ASC investors
may then fail to recoup when the center operates at much less than full
capacity. Under-building results in lost cases and revenues, as patients
and surgeons will go elsewhere if they can’t schedule a procedure at the ASC
within a reasonable amount of time.
To avoid overbuilding and under-building, careful up-front
planning is essential. Here are some of the key elements of the planning
process.
Do Your Due Diligence
The “If you build it, they will come” strategy may have
worked for Kevin Costner in the movie “Field of Dreams,” but it’s not a
strategy that works in real life. If you’re investing in an ASC, invest the
time and money to complete a careful analysis of market needs up front.
Before you make any decisions regarding the center’s size,
layout, equipment and any specialty procedure rooms, you should have a good idea
of the number and types of procedures you can expect to attract, and how much
reimbursement you can reasonably expect to collect for each procedure. A good
analysis of market and space needs will consider your center’s potential
market share as well as how population growth trends may affect your patient
volume over the next five to 10 years.
The analysis should translate the number of procedures you
anticipate into a projected number of surgical suites needed, considering the
average amount of time each procedure will require, the “turnaround time”
for each suite between procedures, and other scheduling issues.
Finally, your analysis should consider potential
reimbursement, based on your ability to negotiate favorable contracts with local
preferred provider networks, insurers and employers, and construction cost
estimates, staffing costs and other operating costs. At this point, a financial
professional can help you determine the feasibility of constructing centers of
various sizes.
Approaching potential payers before you construct your center
to discuss contracting arrangements and potential reimbursement is a good way to
answer an important question — whether providers in your area will pay enough
per procedure to justify the cost of constructing and operating the center.
Think about your programming assumptions. The development of a
space allocation program is an essential step in planning your center, because
it is often the step that determines whether a center will be overbuilt,
under-built or the right size. The space allocation program is based on the
number and type of cases to be performed at the center, whether you anticipate
low or high turnover of surgical suites, and the length of time patients need to
remain in the recovery area. For example, an orthopedic surgery procedure might
take 30 minutes, while the recovery process may extend up to six hours.
Review your assumptions carefully to make sure they are
reasonable. Assuming shorter procedure times and a more rapid turnaround
of suites than your staff can actually support may result in a center that has
too few suites. Allowing too much time for procedures and turnaround could
result in a center with too many suites. A professional planner can help you
establishing realistic assumptions, based on your center’s unique staff and
caseload.
Build what you can sustain, but design for expansion. A good
feasibility study will identify current and future market needs. In a common
scenario, a center needs four surgical suites now to support project patient
volumes, but will need two additional suites within 10 years. The solution is a flexible design that allows investors to
construct four suites now and add two more suites when the center’s caseload
increases. This conservative strategy positions the center to accommodate more
procedures in the future without saddling investors with an unsustainable debt
load now.
A key element of a plan that supports future expansion is core
support spaces — including office space, waiting areas, staff lounges and
storage — sized to support the center after it expands. Support spaces,
typically located in the building’s interior, are costly, difficult and
disruptive areas to expand. Sizing these spaces to support a larger center from
the beginning is a wise and cost-effective long-term investment.
The design should also ensure the center can continue to
operate with minimal inconvenience to patients and physicians when expansion
takes place, and that an adequate number of pre-operative and recovery beds will
be available when the center expands. Some centers opt to construct the full
number of suites they will ultimately place in service, but leave one or more
suites as empty “shelled” spaces, to be completed and equipped when volumes
justify.
Build well-equipped multi-purpose suites rather than specialty
suites. Dedicating surgical suites to a single specialty is a bad idea for two
reasons. Single-purpose suites aggravate the turf issues that inevitably arise.
If other rooms are operating at capacity, the sight of a frequently empty
orthopaedic or ophthalmology suite becomes a constant irritant. Specialty suites
also reduce the center’s ability to maximize patient throughput. Oversizing at least one room to
handle general as well as specialty cases allows more scheduling flexibility.
Some specialties can be well-supported by portable equipment.
For those requiring fixed equipment, over-sizing the room to provide adequate
space for other types of procedures allows the center to gain the most usage out
of its most expensive space.
Determine the functions you must perform at the center, and
those you can outsource without compromising quality or service. Many centers
affiliated with hospitals can outsource a number of functions, including central
sterile processing, biomedical engineering, billing, and business office
services. Any service you can outsource cost effectively reduces your investment
in construction, staff and equipment. That may enable a center’s investors to recoup their
investment and become profitable more quickly.
When doctors affiliated with one medical center in Tennessee
constructed an outpatient surgery center in a medical office building connected
with the hospital, they negotiated an up-front agreement with the hospital,
which handles their central sterile processing, and billing at competitive
market rates. The contract reduced the size by the center by more than 1,000
square feet and enabled them to avoid a significant investment in sterile
processing equipment. It was a good arrangement for both parties.
Outsourcing opportunities are also available to freestanding
facilities. In some areas, centers can contract with outside services to
provide sterile processing.
Design staging and recovery spaces to do double duty. Because
recovery times can vary widely depending on the patient and the procedure, one
effective strategy to reduce construction costs is to design the pre-operative
staging, post-anesthesia recovery and stage two recovery areas to flow together.
Centers typically need more staging beds in the morning and more recovery beds
in the afternoon. Spaces that can start out as staging and then swing to
accommodate recovery can reduce your construction investment while providing
ample space throughout the day.
Don’t forget to plan for adequate parking. You’ve planned
for the growth of your facility from four to six suites. Have you also provided
adequate space for the additional parking needed to accommodate the doctors,
staff and patients when those suites are added? If your plan fails to provide
adequate parking for everyone, you lose one of the major advantages outpatient
centers offer — patient convenience.
Dr. Kildare enlists the aid of Dr. John McIntyre, a
well-respected senior surgeon in the Multispecialty Surgical Group, to present
the results of the market study, and review the group’s programming
assumptions. Even Dr. John Carter, a high-profile surgeon who initially insisted
on a private suite with his name on the door, can’t argue with the practice’s
plan to construct a center with four suites with the ability to add two suites
within 10 years. Dr. Kildare’s next challenge: To tell partner Mark Craig that
other partners have unanimously rejected the interior design plan proposed by
his wife — pink shag carpeting, bright orange walls and mood lighting.
Sam Burnette, AIA, a senior designer for Earl Swensson
Associates, has designed hospitals, surgery centers and other healthcare
projects across the country.
|