Network Sites: Immediate Care Business Renal Business Today Infection Control Today EndoNurse Germstop
Surgistrategies
Search 
Weekly E-mail Newsletter 

ASC Financing
Avoiding the Money Pit

By Jennifer Schraag

Specialty healthcare requires a unique financing structure to ensure a successful venture. Knowing where to start and arming your center against the common financial pitfalls is half the battle – as well as the ultimate payoff.

The money is out there, interest rates are currently decent, and terms can be quite reasonable. In fact, the current financial outlook for ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) is excellent, according to Peter Myhre, president of Chicago, Ill.-based MarCap Corp. “Customers have numerous finance options in the lending market and the experienced lenders that focus in the ASC market should be able to provide a variety of finance alternatives to choose from.”

You just have to know where to look and how to access the best deals.

Before courting any kind of deal, rule No. 1 shared by the experts is the resounding, “You must understand your financial needs.”

“Understanding the costs includes having a good plan in place that projects the tenant improvement costs, equipment costs, and working capital needs over a couple of years period so that you can control and measure as you are going along, how you are doing against that plan,” advises William M. Karnes, cofounder and chief financial of- ficer of Westchester, Ill.-based Regent Surgical Health.

A solid, detailed, in-depth pro forma is critical to this understanding, adds Chris McMenemy, vice president of Columbia, S.C.-based Ortmann Healthcare Consultants. “You must have accurate estimates of how much revenue the center can expect for at least the first three years,” she recommends. “And, just saying I think I’ll have about 2,000 procedures is not good enough. You need to look at your current caseload, analyze how much of it will be transferable to the center, and know how managed care contracting will affect the transfer of cases and the amount of revenue you will receive. You must know your construction costs, your equipment costs, your annual expenses, and your working capital needs. Only with this information in hand will you be able to adequately project your financing needs. If the amount that is financed is inadequate, real problems will arise. And, if too much is financed, you will pay more than is necessary in interest expense,” she points out.

Karnes says the most common pitfall he sees is that people simply have very poor projections. “They don’t have the ability or model that allows them to understand how much money they need to open a center. They miss on the tenant improvement dollars, they don’t get good bids from their subcontractors, they miss on the equipment, they don’t plan upfront what they are going to need for every room; the key equipment needs. Probably the thing they miss the most is the soft costs: the legal fees, the consulting fees, the permit fees, any accounting tax fees to get the amenity up and running.

“The solution is,” he offers, “is you have a good predictive model which allows you on a monthly basis to determine what your inflows and outflows are going to be. You get good estimates from your general contractor on your construction costs and upfront you identify your equipment needs. Then, build a cost estimate of those so you don’t get big surprises and the money you think you have for working capital is eaten up by either construction or by equipment.”

Todd Tidmore, managing director of Addison, Texas-based Med- Capital Group, agrees that clients often overlook including all of the true costs into their budget when building a new center. He points out that unless one obtains real estate financing on an ongoing basis, there are many “norms” that could be missed. He explains, “For example, what is the normal loan to value? What really is a good interest rate for this type of project? What are the true options? The considerations vary widely depending upon the objective of the borrower. I would recommend that the borrower truly identify what their objective is. For example, is the interest rate the most important component of the financing I am seeking, or is it loan to cost, or recourse, or lower equity?”

Karnes says that unless you have a good manager who can project these things for you, oftentimes you are not going to have the ability to understand the connivance they have put into place and what that is going to mean. “You then run the risk of defaulting on your loan in the first few months of operation because you don’t meet the coverage covenant or you don’t meet the working capital covenant that will be in the loan,” he says.

Shopping around for lenders also is vital. Tidmore says people don’t really explore all their options, and McMenemy points out that not getting proposals from several lenders is a real problem that occurs regularly.

She says clients who have a good relationship with a particular bank may feel that approaching this “friend” will give the best results. “It’s possible that it will, but that’s not a fact that can be depended upon,” she points out. “Unfortunately, too often the ‘local bank’ is more likely to be conservative in its terms and its guarantee requirements. Looking at national as well as local options is wise,” she adds.

Karnes advises against the local banks because of their lack of niche knowledge of the ASC industry. He says proper structuring of a loan for an ASC differs greatly from what most banks will normally offer.

He explains, “In most cases, your local business is a good financing source and they may give you the best pricing because you have your home mortgages with them and you have other business relationships with them, but they may not understand the surgery business. One of the things that people miss is they don’t get a lender that understands the business; therefore they don’t get a loan structure that is reflective of the start up of the business. If they do not understand it, they are not going to structure that loan in a way that is best for that center. They are going to expect that when you complete construction, you are going to start paying them.

“Pick a lender that knows the ASC business — the leaps and lags in terms of cash flow, the contracting aspects that drive a lot of the receivables. What we’re seeing is there are a lot of good lenders. There are a lot of people that understand our business and are good, solid lenders and have well-structured financing terms.

“A good industry lender will say first of all we will accrue the interest during the construction period, we’ll build it into the loan so you don’t have to come out of pocket for interest while you’re not generating any cash. Secondly, for the first three months, there are no payments and perhaps for months three to six, or four to six, you pay interest only. Then in month seven, you begin amortization of the principal balance of the loan, over the term of the loan. They will structure like this because they understand that this center is not going to generate any cash for the first three or four months and it will be spending cash to pay for salaries while waiting for collections.”

That said, ASC entrepreneurs also must understand they have to give to get. Equity — one small word, but a giant consideration. The amount of equity a group of physicians presents at the onset of courting financing is what may very well make or break the deal.

“Banks are not equity partners,” Tidmore explains. “They are not suppliers of equity, they are suppliers of debt.”

Karnes agrees, adding, “People think that they can borrow all the money that they need to do the deal because they are great doctors, they have a great historical track record of patient flows and people are going to look at that and want to do business with them and that’s true, but unless you have enough equity in the transaction, you’re going to run out of cash.”

Simply put: “Raise more money,” advises Robert S. Goodman, CHE, managing partner of Westampton, N.J.-based Mansfield Group LLC. Goodman says he always goes in with a base assumption that his clients are going to try to raise somewhere in the neighborhood of 25 percent equity. “We know what lenders are looking for, so this way you’re borrowing around 75 to 80 percent. The closer you get to 70 percent, the better the structure will be. More specifically, I mean the guarantee structure. If you put in say 30 percent equity you have a shot at maybe getting nonrecourse financing meaning a no guarantee transaction. At 20 percent, it’s not likely.”

Equity also commits your partners to the deal, Karnes points out. “If someone has written a check for $50,000 they are much more aware of costs in terms of the types of equipment they are buying, they are much more aware of revenue needs in terms of bringing their patients to the center, than if they had a $5,000 investment which is more meaningless to them. An equity commitment cements you to the deal,” he asserts.

Another aspect that comes into play is the level of guarantee. “Sometimes people don’t want to put at risk what needs to be put at risk in terms of cash, equity, and oftentimes guarantees,” Goodman states.

Karnes explains that if you personally guarantee the whole loan, you’re going to get a lower rate than if you only guarantee half the loan or none of the loan. “And if there is a guarantee, the lenders that understand the business generally let the guarantee burn off or go away over a 12 to 24 month time period if you meet your projections,” he explains.

McMenemy on the other hand advises against such structures “Joint and several guarantees on the loan is a term that should be avoided in any financing contract,” she asserts. She offers considerations that should be put in perspective before agreeing to such a deal. “If the value of the loan is $1 million, and there are five investors, each might expect to be responsible for only one-fifth of the loan or $200,000. If the loan requires joint and several guarantees, then each investor is ultimately responsible for the entire loan. Additionally, if an investor tries to get financing for a different project, a credit report may show that the investor is already in debt for $1 million, rather than the $200,000 portion.”

Myhre says the amount of personal guarantees required by a lender can range from zero percent to 100 percent of the loan amount. “The client really needs to think through what it would do if something goes wrong. It is easy to assume things will work out, otherwise why proceed at all? Unfortunately, all projects do not work out as planned. Personal guarantees can kick in, in a worst-case scenario. This involves going beyond the legal confines and safety of typically a limited liability company, and pursuing the personal assets of an individual owner.

“The client should consider multiple options as to the level of personal guarantees required,” he advises. “If guarantees are required, they should be several rather than joint. Several guarantees divide the total guarantee amount up between the individual owners. Joint guarantees takes the path of least resistance and pursues the wealthiest guarantors first.”

McMenemy advises looking at pre-payment penalties. “The ASC will want the flexibility of being able to pay off the loan at its convenience,” she points out. “It is not unusual for some penalty to exist, but it’s important that the facility is not completely barred from paying off a loan or refinancing a loan. Who would have thought 10 years ago that interest rates would go as low as the norm was just a few months ago? The ASC needs to be in the position to take advantage of changing market rates as well as greater than anticipated profitability that could lead to early payoff of the loan.”

Working capital requirements for a new ASC can be as significant in terms of dollar requirements as each of the other categories. Working capital is that amount of money needed to pay for expenses incurred from the beginning of the project until revenue is received. “These requirements are the least understood capital requirements and often the most overlooked need,” warns McMenemy.

She also points out that it is often necessary to help educate both the accountants and bankers on this subject, as the needs of the ASC can be quite different from other businesses. “Reason being is that most businesses start functioning when they get their certificate of occupancy from the local governmental entity,” she explains. “The ASC on the other hand cannot start full operations until it is state licensed, Medicare certified, and in some situations accredited.

The amount of time to go through these processes varies by state, she says, but can be lengthy (one to four months) even if you pass all inspections the first time around. As a result the ASC must have working capital reserves to pay for all operational expenses for at least three to four months of operation. “When one adds the requirements up, you will find that working capital requirements often equal or exceed the requirements for equipment or construction,” she adds.

She continues, “If you have not properly budgeted for these needs or if problems occur that delay the opening of your center, you may exhaust your working capital loan. At this point, you will have to go back to the owners of the ASC and ask for another capital call to raise the needed money or go back to your financial institutions and refinance your previous loan. This can create a great deal of dissatisfaction among the owners who thought they had contributed all of the money necessary for this project and will also likely change your pro-forma estimates a great deal and prolong the day when the center begins to start profitable operations. It is far better to overestimate the working capital requirements and not use the money, than to underestimate the requirement and have to go back to your investors for more money.”

Karnes says it is pretty consistent that the thing people overlook the most is the working capital. “One thing we always recommend is if you’re going to borrow money for your tenant improvement or borrow money for your equipment, you put in place a working capital line with that same financing source. So if your equity does run out, you have $250,000 or $500,000 of bank money you can borrow against to get to the time when collections are exceeding your payables and you begin to generate positive cash flow.”

Nightmares concerning ASC financing can occur in nearly every facet of the process. For example, the rush to finance is a common problem, according to McMenemy. “The amount spent in financing costs is huge and not taking enough time to adequately study the options can have significant financial consequences,” she warns. “You might wonder why anyone would rush to get financing done, but as there are so many deadlines that have to be met in getting an ASC started that it’s not really all that uncommon. Needing to have cash ready for a real estate close date is one of the most common reasons for needing to rush into financing.”

It takes a long time to complete a financing project. “Oftentimes people do not understand there is a process you have to go through in order to get approval and more important to sell your story in such a way to the lender that you get the best possible structure of the transaction and the best possible rate,” Goodman advises.

Most physicians are so busy, that it’s dif- ficult to wade through the unfamiliar terms and sheer volume of material that must be read. McMenemy advises having a trusted advisor.

Karnes agrees, “This is a good decision for a doctor group to make because they get the benefit of that learned knowledge and contacts when it comes to any of these financing decisions.”

As Goodman points out, in all likelihood a local start up will involve a group of doctors that have not before explored these types of financing avenues. “Inexperience is a pitfall,” he asserts, and he too advises seeking help from knowledgeable industry leaders. “Most of the management companies have relationships with a lot of the lenders and they have kind of developed a rhythm, if you will, and a methodology with the lender. That lender knows this management company so when this management company brings a project to that lender, they kind of know from experience what each other is looking for and presenting. So there is an experience base that is helpful,” he adds.

Other last minute nightmares can include something as simple as the appraisal process. Managing the appraisal process can play a significant role in a smooth transaction, Tidmore points out. “Make sure the lender understands the importance of using an appraiser that has experience in dealing with the costs of the type of medical building that you are building,” he advises. Tidmore explains that if the appraiser is undereducated in the true value of an ASC facility, it can be appraised too low which can ultimately have a devastating effect on the financing of that facility.

“What we have seen are customers that come to us after their first finance company did not deliver the terms that were expected,” Myhre adds. “This has included an out right rejection at the last minute which can really create problems. When you are developing an ASC, unexpected delays can be a disaster. Your finance company should very clearly spell out the timeframes and activities to complete a mutually agreeable proposal, due diligence which should include a site visit, internal process to obtain credit approval, what changes may come out of due diligence and credit committee process, obtaining documents, potential negotiations, and funding.”

Overall, Karnes says it is the operational issues that create the most nightmares. “Typically, the nightmares occur because operations are functioning low after the center opens its doors,” he interjects. “Operational issues such as it takes you longer than you anticipated to open the doors because you don’t have a good contractor and the work isn’t done on time. Operational issues such as you have the wrong case mix or you have a lot of low reimbursement cases and you built an expensive center or you bought expensive equipment and you can’t cover the costs because your reimbursements are too low. You don’t have enough doctors. You try to do it with three or four doctors thinking that others will come later. You don’t attract those other doctors and your revenue is not enough from those doctors to pay the costs of that facility.

“Or, you sign the wrong contracts,” he continues. “You sign a lot of low reimbursement contracts thinking it is going to drive volume. It does draw volume, but your staff costs and your supply costs are high and your reimbursements per case are low and you can’t cover your costs.”

Whatever the issue, Tidmore points out that honesty is always the best policy. He shares an example of when last October he had a client who was not honest about his financial position and had filed bankruptcy two weeks before closing on a deal.

“He could have gone to jail had the lender been a federally insured institution,” Tidmore asserts. “You have got to be honest with all of your documentation on a project because through the review process, they will find out. You have to realize you will have to really bear your financial soul to any lender.” 


Constructive Considerations

In June 2004, the New York state Health department fined Saratoga Hospital $10,000 for the construction and financing of an ambulatory surgery center (asc) in Saratoga springs citing inappropriate state authorization.¹ “We found it appropriate and necessary to fine Saratoga Hospital for what we determined to be the hospital’s inexplicable failure to adhere to well-established state regulations regarding the financing and construction of the project,” asserts New York’s state health commissioner Antonia C. Novello, Md, MPH, DRPH, in a press release.

The state investigation determined that Saratoga Hospital incurred additional debt and closed on the financing of the project without appropriate state authorization when constructing the new asc. The state found amendments related to the cost and financing of the original 2002 certificate of need (con) proposal for the construction of the asc.

The original application submitted to the department for consideration projected a cost of $10.3 million; however, subsequent estimates by the hospital determined that the project cost would total more than $12.8 million when construction was completed. in addition, significant restructuring of refinancing components of the project loan occurred, extending the terms of the mortgage to 30 years. The terms of the loan, “which far exceeded state standards,” included a deferral of principal payments and the refinancing of both operating and equipment expenditures for a 30-year period. The state does not allow 30-year mortgages for capital projects, the state department reports.

In addition to the fine, the hospital was required to submit a written Plan of correction (Poc). as part of the Poc, the department imposed restrictions on future debt financing of capital projects by Saratoga Hospital, including mandatory accelerated payments on loans — citing that the requirement will “help balance the excessive terms of the financing in this enforcement case.”

In the press release, novella continues, “While there was a clear need for this expansion it was a critical error to fail to gain the necessary approvals to carry it out. Healthcare providers across the state are fully knowledgeable of New York’s rules governing the approval process for con applications and, frankly, there is no excuse for a breach of those requirements.”

However, William M. Karnes, cofounder and chief financial officer of regent surgical Health, says sometimes when put in perspective, such fines are a necessary evil.

He explains, “The problem is that construction costs have accelerated recently. We are in close to a full employment economy. There have been some drains on materials for rebuilding the areas affected by the hurricanes, so we’re seeing pricing inflation. We are also seeing that most of the states have construction costs that are two or three years out of date. So the combination of more recent inflationary cost increases plus construction costs that are out of date have caused a lot of pressure on the tenant improvement side of con budgets.

“Almost every project that i am aware of has trouble with their con budget in terms of once you get into construction, you inevitably find a few things that you didn’t count on and you have to enhance the building; you have to add things to the building you didn’t anticipate. A tight budget becomes a very difficult budget and people do go over and they get fined.”

Karnes says you have to put the fine into perspective. “If you are building a three or four or (operating room) center, you may be spending $1.9 to $2.5 million for tenant improvement work — not including equipment, just improvement to the space. So, $10,000 isn’t a lot of money in relation to $2. million. it is difficult to control the budgets because I think they are too low to begin with. recent pricing inflation, which is affecting both labor costs and equipment and supply costs, is going to be a continuing issue. What needs to happen is the con boards need to reflect current construction costs not dated construction costs.”

The other question is do you delay your project by going back to the con board and trying to get a variance at such a crucial time. “When you have a multi-million dollar project that is running and you have run all the costs; you’ve let interest carry on your loan and you may be paying rent on your space — think of the costs you are incurring every month to handle those things,” Karnes advises. “if you wait or stop to go back to get a variance on the con, it may not make any sense because you are accruing too many other costs that are eating you up. once you have a construction project up and running, you need to continue because there are just too many negatives to slow the process.” 


Reference

1. New York state department of Health “state Health department Fines saratoga Hospital $10,000 for unauthorized construction, Financing of regional outpatient surgery center.” June 2004. accessed online March 6, 2006 at 
http://www.health.state.ny.us/press/releases/
2004/saratoga_hospital_release_06-25-2004.htm


Share this article: Email, Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Yahoo!MyWeb, Windows Live Favorites, Furl
RSS Add this article feed to: RSS, My Yahoo, Newsgator, Bloglines

Post a Comment

Email Email this article Comment Add a comment
Print Printer version Reprints Order reprints
RSS RSS Feed Bookmark Bookmark article






Subscribe to SurgiStrategies Magazine
First Name Last Name
E-mail

Sponsored LinksSurgiStrategies Announcements